Yeah. I have a guest I just recorded, Eliot Edge, who brings physics and simulation theory into all this and ended up with the same conclusions as you.
I would be interested in knowing what your sources are when you write about "the kinds of magic that science is finally learning to accept, like ESP.."
Try Mitch Horowitz's Practical Magick. He lists the best studies for retrocausality, ESP, remote viewing, and other well established phenomena. This does not mean there's no physics explanations for these things. Only that we don't know them yet.
"Ritual cannot rely exclusively on human
machinations to obtain the full effect. Forteans humorously kick around the
idea of a "library angel" that works for some of us. If I need research
material, sometimes I get it not because I diligently searched the stacks at
Cornell University, but because the material I wanted presented itself to me
randomly, like Hannibal Lecter says in Silence of the Lambs, with "desperate
randomness."
A first reaction would be to say I received the research material "by
accident." But then how is this doctrine of the accidental sustained in the
presence of someone who is accident-prone, for whom this "accidental"
transmission of information is a regular occurrence?
Ritual is obsession in motion. Obsessive people are walking rituals and
they attract, "coincidentally," aids to their obsessions. If this is done
consciously and the obsession happens to coordinate with the trend and
tendency of the time, a lot more "coincidental" magnification will be
forthcoming.
Coincidence can be summoned. It's a matter of attention and timing. First
you become aware of - believing in and observing - the mechanism of
coincidence when it agrees with your work, then you coordinate what you're
working on with what you were predestined to do.
When you start to see the pattern of coincidence and it becomes a
language for you, you have become either an initiate or a schizophrenic, take
your pick, because you lose the protection of materialism -- our protection
against the disordering of the arrangement we've given to the world to make
it manageable"
Yeah. I have a guest I just recorded, Eliot Edge, who brings physics and simulation theory into all this and ended up with the same conclusions as you.
I would be interested in knowing what your sources are when you write about "the kinds of magic that science is finally learning to accept, like ESP.."
Thanks!
Try Mitch Horowitz's Practical Magick. He lists the best studies for retrocausality, ESP, remote viewing, and other well established phenomena. This does not mean there's no physics explanations for these things. Only that we don't know them yet.